<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Completely new giveaway rating system (beta release)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:33:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: casiseb</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-82065</link>
		<dc:creator>casiseb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-82065</guid>
		<description>Merci beaucoup vraiment génial ce site je vais venir tous les jours !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merci beaucoup vraiment génial ce site je vais venir tous les jours !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-78022</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-78022</guid>
		<description>When we add our rating using the latest rating system the image for the new rating is not re-loaded, there is no visual feedback that the reating had been incorporated into the stats... We have to manually refresh the entire page to see the new star rating graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we add our rating using the latest rating system the image for the new rating is not re-loaded, there is no visual feedback that the reating had been incorporated into the stats&#8230; We have to manually refresh the entire page to see the new star rating graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-77314</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-77314</guid>
		<description>I like the new reviewing system but would also like to keep the old overall thumbs up/down by percentage too. It makes a good at-a-glance reference.

In any event, I appreciate GAOTD and happily tell my friends about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new reviewing system but would also like to keep the old overall thumbs up/down by percentage too. It makes a good at-a-glance reference.</p>
<p>In any event, I appreciate GAOTD and happily tell my friends about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo Gray</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-77124</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-77124</guid>
		<description>I kinda like the idea. However, Ashraf may be the only one that can see if there are repeated users adding to the critique every day. I hazard a guess that the majority of users offering a responce are in general terms &#039;frequent flyers&#039; as there is little time for the majority to be able to, or even want to, offer a full and meaningfull critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like the idea. However, Ashraf may be the only one that can see if there are repeated users adding to the critique every day. I hazard a guess that the majority of users offering a responce are in general terms &#8216;frequent flyers&#8217; as there is little time for the majority to be able to, or even want to, offer a full and meaningfull critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james0622</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-76781</link>
		<dc:creator>james0622</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-76781</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if we could go back to the ratings and change or add new comments.
Because after using the program I find new good and bad things about it.
But It will not let me back in to edit something or add a view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if we could go back to the ratings and change or add new comments.<br />
Because after using the program I find new good and bad things about it.<br />
But It will not let me back in to edit something or add a view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KO_Gilligan</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-76444</link>
		<dc:creator>KO_Gilligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-76444</guid>
		<description>Great stuff GOTD - if people like your site or not, you guys have set the standard.

I&#039;d like to see the Software Provider indicate what Operating System the software supports.  It&#039;s rather hit and miss for some packages where were left looking at other&#039;s experiences</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff GOTD &#8211; if people like your site or not, you guys have set the standard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the Software Provider indicate what Operating System the software supports.  It&#8217;s rather hit and miss for some packages where were left looking at other&#8217;s experiences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Me</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-75748</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-75748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if anybody still checks back to the comments here, but I will leave my opinion anyway.

After having used the new system for a while I came to the conclusion that I like the new system but there is one very &lt;b&gt;important rating missing&lt;/b&gt;. As things are now we are rating many things except for the main one which is whether the &lt;b&gt;software&lt;/b&gt; actually &lt;b&gt;works&lt;/b&gt; well or not.

I would suggest adding a rating for &lt;b&gt;&quot;DOES WHAT IT SAYS ON THE BOX&quot;&lt;/b&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if anybody still checks back to the comments here, but I will leave my opinion anyway.</p>
<p>After having used the new system for a while I came to the conclusion that I like the new system but there is one very <b>important rating missing</b>. As things are now we are rating many things except for the main one which is whether the <b>software</b> actually <b>works</b> well or not.</p>
<p>I would suggest adding a rating for <b>&#8220;DOES WHAT IT SAYS ON THE BOX&#8221;</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetSci</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-75735</link>
		<dc:creator>MetSci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-75735</guid>
		<description>Old rating system was much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old rating system was much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory Keogh</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-75704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Keogh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-75704</guid>
		<description>The new rating is terrible.  Time has now shown that most viewers don&#039;t even rate the software via the new system.  PLEASE go back to the Thumbs Up/Thumbs down system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new rating is terrible.  Time has now shown that most viewers don&#8217;t even rate the software via the new system.  PLEASE go back to the Thumbs Up/Thumbs down system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bentl1</title>
		<link>http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/completely-new-giveaway-rating-system/comment-page-2/#comment-73959</link>
		<dc:creator>bentl1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.giveawayoftheday.com/?p=180#comment-73959</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t care for the new rating system. The older one allowed you at a glance to see the cumulative results. The new one, in no way, is as efficient or definitive. Please go back to the &quot;thumbs up/down&quot; rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t care for the new rating system. The older one allowed you at a glance to see the cumulative results. The new one, in no way, is as efficient or definitive. Please go back to the &#8220;thumbs up/down&#8221; rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.406 seconds -->
